Acting U.S. attorney general won’t have to recuse himself from Mueller’s investigation
Acting U.S. Attorney General Matthew Whitaker has been cleared to oversee Robert Mueller’s investigation into alleged Russian “collusion” with the Trump Campaign during the 2016 presidential election, according to reports.
Justice Department ethics officials decided the acting AG won’t have to recuse himself from the Russia probe and have been in talks with Whitaker since he took the job in November following Jeff Sessions’ departure.
Despite mounting pressure from Democrats, who claim Whitaker displays “hostility” toward Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his investigation, officials agreed that the concerns were unfounded, clearing the acting AG to move forward.
Since Mr. Whitaker was chosen for the role, previous comments he had made – in which he described the “political makeup” of Mueller’s grand juries as “concerning” – have emerged.
A 2016 interview also reemerged, in which the former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Iowa claimed that there is “enough evidence” to investigate the Clinton Foundation.
Whitaker said there is more than enough evidence “in the public domain” to delegate the appointment of a “special prosecutor” to investigate the Clinton charity.
A source familiar with the matter told Fox News on Thursday that Whitaker met with Justice Department ethics officials this week, who told him he was not precluded from overseeing Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling and potential collusion with Trump campaign associates during the 2016 presidential election.
Whitaker, who served as chief of staff to former Attorney General Jeff Sessions until Sessions was fired, has faced extreme pressure from Democrats to recuse himself to ensure that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein continues in that role.
Sessions recused himself from overseeing the probe due to his work on the Trump campaign in 2016, turning control to Rosenstein, who appointed Mueller on May 17, 2017.
Sessions, whose resignation was requested in early November, had been criticized by Trump throughout his tenure at the Justice Department due to the decision to recuse himself from the investigation.
Whitaker’s new role includes oversight of the Russia investigation, along with the agency’s other federal investigations, including the New York prosecutors’ look into the finances of Trump and his former aides.
But Democrats and 18 state attorneys general blasted Whitaker’s appointment, pointing to his past comments in the media about the investigation.
In an op-ed Whitaker wrote last year, he argued that Rosenstein should “order Mueller to limit the scope of his investigation to the four corners of the order appointing the special counsel.”
“If he doesn’t, then Mueller’s investigation will eventually start to look like a political fishing expedition,” Whitaker wrote.
“This would not only be out of character for a respected figure like Mueller but also could be damaging to the President of the United States and his family—and by extension, to the country.”
Separately, in a June 2017 CNN appearance, Whitaker said that he could “see a scenario where Jeff Sessions is replaced with a recess appointment, and that attorney general doesn’t fire Bob Mueller, but he just reduces his budget to so low that his investigation grinds almost to a halt.”
Last month, though, the Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion supporting Whitaker’s appointment, which remains temporary.
Earlier this month, Trump appointed William Barr, who served as attorney general under the late former President George H.W. Bush, to replace Sessions.
Barr is awaiting Senate confirmation.
Mr. Barr has criticized Mueller as well, specifically the lack of “balance” in the team of special counsel prosecutors.
The majority of investigators appointed to the special counsel’s office made significant political donations to Democratic candidates and causes, with a majority also registered as Democratic voters.
But according to a Wall Street Journal report this week, Barr also sent a 20-page memo to the Justice Department calling Mueller’s Russia probe “legally unsupportable” and “potentially disastrous,” specifically referring any inquiries into obstruction of justice.
Barr reportedly wrote that line of inquiry was “fatally misconceived.”
A date for Barr’s Senate confirmation hearing has yet to be set.