Democrats push new narrative that taxpayer cash is free money
Democrat Joe Biden and his allies have started peddling a new narrative that their budget-busting $3.5 trillion spending bill “costs zero dollars” because it is “paid for with taxes.”
Perhaps what is most worrying is that the Democratic Party actually expects people to believe their nonsense about taxpayer money simply growing on trees.
Over the weekend, regime leader Biden lit the fuse on their latest propaganda campaign.
He posted a message from his Twitter account claiming that his “Build Back Better Agenda” has no cost — despite the bill’s massive $3.5 trillion price tag.
“My Build Back Better Agenda costs zero dollars,” Biden tweeted.
“Instead of wasting money on tax breaks, loopholes, and tax evasion for big corporations and the wealthy, we can make a once-in-a-generation investment in working America.”
“And it adds zero dollars to the national debt,” Biden added.
My Build Back Better Agenda costs zero dollars.
Instead of wasting money on tax breaks, loopholes, and tax evasion for big corporations and the wealthy, we can make a once-in-a-generation investment in working America.
And it adds zero dollars to the national debt.
— President Biden (@POTUS) September 26, 2021
White House spokesperson Andrew Bates told Axios on Friday, “The bill’s price tag is $0 because it will be paid for by ending failed, special tax giveaways for the richest taxpayers and big corporations, adding nothing to the debt.”
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, repeated the erroneous claim during an interview Sunday on CBS News’ “Face The Nation.”
“President Biden also said something very important the other day, which is, this is a zero-dollar bill because it’s going to be completely paid for with taxes on the wealthiest and the largest corporations,” Jayapal said.
Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell boasted a similar claim Sunday on CNN’s “Reliable Sources.”
“The bill itself will not cost $3.5T in the sense it will be entirely, or at least partly, paid for,” Rampell claimed.
“So the actual cost, in terms of deficits, will be smaller than that, perhaps even zero, although I think that’s unlikely.”
As CBS News host Margaret Brennan told Jayapal, the massive spending package that Democrats want to pass, hardly knowing everything that is in it, does not cost zero dollars.
“The joint committee on taxation says actually that, in raising this revenue, taxes could go up at least 2% on those making between $200,000 and $500,000 a year,” Brennan explained.
“It also will raise taxes for corporations and those who are wealthier.
“So it’s not no-cost.”
The Wall Street Journal aptly characterized Democrats’ new talking point as “the largest tax increase as a share of GDP and the largest entitlement expansion since the 1960s costs nothing.
“And money grows on trees.”
In fact, according to the WSJ, the proposed tax increase does not even cover the spending Democrats have proposed:
In the real world, Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation says the bill raises $2.1 trillion over 10 years. Somebody must be paying more. Among the tax hikes are a 5.5 percentage point increase in the corporate income tax rate that will be paid by workers in lower wages, consumers in higher prices and investors in lower returns. Though they’ll be pleased to know this all adds up to “zero dollars.”
As for the spending, the $3.5 trillion figure that Bernie Sanders considers a “compromise” doesn’t even capture the full cost of what Democrats are proposing. As we explained Friday, that amount is based on budget gimmickry including entitlement phaseouts and phase-ins, and the real cost will be at least $5 trillion, probably far more.
So even after $2.1 trillion in tax hikes, the entitlements in the reconciliation package that include the child allowance, college tuition, national pre-K, universal child care, expanded Medicare and a new Medicaid program will add to the U.S. debt for decades to come.
Even if Democrats found enough money via tax increases to cover the cost of the bill, the National Review’s Philip Klien pointed out the bill would still leave a fiscal footprint.
“Any time the government raises taxes to pay for newly-passed spending it taps revenue sources that are no longer available to meet existing obligations,” Klein explained.
“Increasing spending, in every circumstance, increases the burden on government finances.”