‘Sophisticated’ algorithm has flags America most important document
Facebook’s ‘sophisticated’ algorithm has flagged and deleted one of America’s most important written documents – The Declaration of Independence for…wait for it…”hate speech.”
The excerpt was posted by a small community newspaper in Texas on the 4th of July, but it aa[rantly violated social media site’s policies against “hate speech” and was swiftly removed by the platform.
Facebook page, the Liberty County Vindicator of Liberty County, Texas, has been sharing excerpts from e declaration in the run-up to July Fourth.
The idea was innocently attempting to encourage historical literacy among the Vindicator’s readers, but Facebook didn’t like it. At all.
According to reason.com: “But part 10,” writes Vindicator managing editor Casey Stinnett, “did not appear. Instead, The Vindicator received a notice from Facebook saying that the post ‘goes against our standards on hate speech.’”
The post in question contained paragraphs 27 through 31 of the Declaration of Independence, the grievance section of the document wherein the put-upon colonists detail all the irreconcilable differences they have with King George III.
Stinnett says that he cannot be sure which exact grievance ran afoul of Facebook’s policy, but he assumes that it’s paragraph 31, which excoriates the King for inciting “domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages.”
READ MORE: Facebook Survey Asks Users if They Want Pedophiles to Share MORE Child Porn
The removal of the post was an automated action, and Stinnett sent a “feedback message” to Facebook with the hopes of reaching a human being who could then exempt the Declaration of Independence from its hate speech restrictions.
Fearful that sharing more of the text might trigger the deletion of its Facebook page, The Vindicator has suspended its serialization of the declaration.*
In his article, Stinnett is remarkably sanguine about this censorship.
While unhappy about the decision, he reminds readers “that Facebook is a business corporation, not the government, and as such it is allowed to restrict use of its services as long as those restrictions do not violate any laws.
Plus, The Vindicator is using Facebook for free, so the newspaper has little grounds for complaint other than the silliness of it.”
Of course, Facebook’s actions here are silly.
They demonstrate a problem with automated enforcement of hate speech policies, which is that a robot trained to spot politically incorrect language isn’t smart enough to detect when that language is part of a historically significant document.
None of this is meant as a defense of referring to Native Americans as “savages.”
That phrasing is clearly racist and serves as another example of the American Revolution’s mixed legacy; one that won crucial liberties for a certain segment of the population, while continuing to deny those same liberties to Native Americans and African slaves.
But by allowing the less controversial parts of the declaration to be shared while deleting the reference to “Indian savages,” Facebook succeeds only in whitewashing America’s founding just as we get ready to celebrate it.
A more thoughtful approach to Independence Day—for both celebrants and social media companies alike—would be to grapple with those historical demons.
Update: Facebook has reportedly restored The Vindicator’s declaration post, deeming it to not be a violation of the social media site’s community standards and apologizing to the paper for its “incorrect action.”