Judge Ramos donated to Dems on House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees
The Obama-era New York federal judge, who recently upheld subpoenas requesting President Donald Trump’s taxes, has donated to Democrats who sit on the committees that are seeking the records, according to reports.
On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos ruled that the Trump Administration must comply with two subpoenas from the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees.
Now it has emerged that Ramos has donated to a slew of big-name Democrats over the years, including two who currently sit on those committees, federal election filings show.
U.S. District Judge Ramos, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, ruled the subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and Capital One have “a legitimate legislative purpose” after an hour of oral arguments.
Ramos also declared that President Trump would likely fail should he pursue a lawsuit to quash the requests.
According to Fox News, judges have the option to recuse themselves if there is an appearance of bias.
Federal election records show that, when he was a partner at the law firm Day Pitney LLP and before he was appointed to the bench in 2011, Ramos sent $350 to Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes from 2007 to 2008, as well as $500 to elect New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez in 2010.
Himes sits on both the Intelligence and Financial Services Committees, while Velazquez sits on Financial Services.
Ramos also contributed $1,000 to now-2020 Democrat Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand’s Senate campaign in 2009, another $1,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, and several thousand dollars over several years to Obama for America.
His political donations apparently stopped after his elevation to the judgeship, in line with ethical standards.
Trump’s lawyers had asked Ramos to temporarily block Congress from gaining access to the records.
They said it was a “safe bet” they would appeal his decision.
Ramos’ ruling came two days after another federal judge in Washington upheld a separate congressional subpoena seeking financial documents dating back to 2011 from Trump accounting firm Mazars USA.
That judge, Obama appointee Amit Mehta, donated to the Obama-Biden campaign in 2012.
The White House has aggressively pushed back against Democrat-led investigations in the wake of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report, saying Democrats simply want a “do-over” of Mueller’s lengthy investigation that ultimately found no evidence of any Trump-Russia collusion.
Trump this week blocked former White House lawyer Don McGhan, a central figure in Mueller’s report, from appearing before the House Judiciary Committee.
Some congressional Republicans have also characterized the subpoenas as an abuse of authority and blasted the Trump-focused investigations.
Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, called the inquiry into Mazars USA “an unprecedented abuse of the Committee’s subpoena authority to target and expose the private financial information of the President of the United States.”