Agricultural giant hopes to deceive public and bury controversial history
Agricultural chemical giant Monsanto has one of the world’s worst reputations, and for good reason.
The toxic chemicals they produce have claimed the lives of millions of innocent people over the years, and now it seems that the company is hoping to quietly sweep their dark history under the carpet without anyone noticing.
In the 1970s, Monsanto began developing the carcinogenic glyphosate-based herbicide “Roundup” which is still used today.
They followed up in the 1980s by creating genetically modified (GMO) crop seeds for farmers.
Literally, millions of people all over the world have either died or been seriously affected by their profit-driven actions.
As most people have now woken up to the threat their toxic products pose on society, Monsanto has decided that a name change would be the best way to escape their reputation and allow them to continue fooling citizens into a false belief that they are no longer being exposed to the dangers of their products.
“Bayer will remain the company name. Monsanto will no longer be a company name,” the company said.
“The acquired products will retain their brand names and become part of the Bayer portfolio.”
The name drop appears to be part of a strategic move geared at distancing the new behemoth from negative publicity surrounding Monsanto and genetically modified organisms.
First announced in September 2016 as part of a move designed to boost agricultural research and innovation, the merger is the largest acquisition in Bayer’s history and doubles the size of its farm business.
Distancing itself from the Monsanto label
You can’t utter the name Monsanto in public and not be met with at least one stink eye.
For decades, the company has been met with public outrage and disgust linked to its history of controversial dealings with farmers and its standout role in popularizing GMOs.
This spring, Monsanto landed a spot on a well-known list of the 20 most hated companies in America.
The decision to drop the Monsanto moniker, then, is no huge surprise.
On a call with reporters on Monday, Liam Condon, the head of Bayer’s crop-science division, said Monsanto had “actually itself considered changing its name” at one time, but elected “not to do that, apparently for cost reasons.”
Still, Condon said, “it was an issue for some time for Monsanto management … to try to improve the Monsanto brand.”
“We’re extremely proud of all we’ve accomplished as Monsanto and are eager to continue to accelerate innovation in agriculture as we look forward to a future under Bayer,” Christi Dixon, Monsanto’s public-relations lead, said in a statement to Business Insider.
She added that in the interim, while Monsanto operates independently of Bayer, “it will be business as usual for us, including our company name.”
Monsanto is also moving to invest more deeply in advanced tools for gene editing, a process that can be capitalized on for agricultural purposes to make cheaper but higher-quality produce.
Many companies are moving away from tweaking crops’ DNA with GMOs and other crude methods of genetic modification in favor of more precise techniques like Crispr.
In March, Monsanto put $125 million behind the gene-editing startup Pairwise, a company whose founder, Haven Baker, told Business Insider he aimed to bring the first fruit tweaked with Crispr to grocery-store shelves — a development he expects in five to 10 years.
Tom Adams, who was Monsanto’s vice president of global biotechnology, left to become the CEO of Pairwise this spring.