Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and 10 other Republican senators announce bombshell move
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and ten other Republican senators have announced they have formed an allegiance of senior lawmakers who will refuse the Electoral College certification from several disputed states.
The group signed a letter announcing they will vote “to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’.”
The GOP senators demand that a 10-day emergency audit is conducted in those states.
“We do not take this action lightly,” Sen. Cruz wrote in the letter, which was published Saturday.
“We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it.”
The letter states that the 2020 election “featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities,” which exceed previous elections and must be investigated fully.
Cruz and the other Republicans blasted the Supreme Court, which now contains three justices nominated by President Donald Trump – for not taking up allegations of voter fraud from the November election.
“Ideally, the courts would have heard evidence and resolved these claims of serious election fraud,” the letter says.
“Twice, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to do so; twice, the Court declined.”
The Republican lawmakers said Congress should establish an “Electoral Commission” to investigate alleged election fraud and conduct an “emergency audit” of the election results.
But until that happens, the Republicans will object to the votes of electors from certain battleground states whose election results Republicans claim were tainted by election fraud.
Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states.
Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.
Accordingly, we intend to vote on Jan. 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not “regularly given” and “awfully certified” (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.
The Republicans joining Cruz include:
- Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.)
- Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.)
- Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.)
- Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.)
- Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.)
- Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.)
- Sen.-elect Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.)
- Sen.-elect Roger Marshall (R-Kan.)
- Sen.-elect Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.)
- Sen.-elect Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.)
According to Fox News, the effort orchestrated by Cruz is separate from that being undertaken by Sen. Josh Hawley.
The Missouri Republican announced this week that he will object to the Electoral College vote certification next week on the grounds that Pennsylvania and other states did not follow their own election law.
What about the House?
Two House Republicans told CNN on Thursday that at least 140 House Republicans will object to certifying the Electoral College results.
Neither challenge is expected to change the ultimate outcome of the election.
Read the senators’ full letter below:
America is a Republic whose leaders are chosen in democratic elections. Those elections, in turn, must comply with the Constitution and with federal and state law.
When the voters fairly decide an election, pursuant to the rule of law, the losing candidate should acknowledge and respect the legitimacy of that election. And, if the voters choose to elect a new office-holder, our Nation should have a peaceful transfer of power.
The election of 2020, like the election of 2016, was hard fought and, in many swing states, narrowly decided. The 2020 election, however, featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities.
Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed. By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes.
And those allegations are not believed just by one individual candidate. Instead, they are widespread. Reuters/Ipsos polling, tragically, shows that 39% of Americans believe ‘the election was rigged.’ That belief is held by Republicans (67%), Democrats (17%), and Independents (31%).
Some Members of Congress disagree with that assessment, as do many members of the media.
But, whether or not our elected officials or journalists believe it, that deep distrust of our democratic processes will not magically disappear. It should concern us all. And it poses an ongoing threat to the legitimacy of any subsequent administrations.
Ideally, the courts would have heard evidence and resolved these claims of serious election fraud. Twice, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to do so; twice, the Court declined.
On January 6, it is incumbent on Congress to vote on whether to certify the 2020 election results. That vote is the lone constitutional power remaining to consider and force resolution of the multiple allegations of serious voter fraud.
At that quadrennial joint session, there is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.
The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been conducted illegally.
In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns.
We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.
Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not “regularly given” and “lawfully certified” (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.
We are not naïve. We fully expect most if not all Democrats, and perhaps more than a few Republicans, to vote otherwise. But support of election integrity should not be a partisan issue. A fair and credible audit-conducted expeditiously and completed well before January 20-would dramatically improve Americans’ faith in our electoral process and would significantly enhance the legitimacy of whoever becomes our next President. We owe that to the People.
These are matters worthy of the Congress, and entrusted to us to defend. We do not take this action lightly. We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it. And every one of us should act together to ensure that the election was lawfully conducted under the Constitution and to do everything we can to restore faith in our Democracy.